Chemical Equilibrium and Equilibrium Constants
From the chemistry curriculum
TL;DR
Chemical equilibrium is when a reversible reaction's forward and reverse rates become equal, leading to constant reactant and product concentrations. The equilibrium constant ($K_{eq}$) numerically describes the ratio of products to reactants at equilibrium. A large $K_{eq}$ means more products at equilibrium, while a small $K_{eq}$ means more reactants.
1. The Mental Model
Imagine a busy street with people constantly walking in both directions. At equilibrium, the number of people walking east equals the number walking west, so the total number of people on each side of the street stays constant, even though individuals are still moving.
2. The Core Material
Chemical reactions don't always go to completion; many are reversible, meaning products can react to re-form reactants. When a reversible reaction reaches equilibrium, the rate of the forward reaction (reactants forming products) becomes equal to the rate of the reverse reaction (products forming reactants). At this point, the concentrations of reactants and products no longer change, even though both reactions are still happening. It's a dynamic state.
The Equilibrium Constant ($K_{eq}$)
The equilibrium constant, $K_{eq}$ (or sometimes $K_c$ for concentration, $K_p$ for pressure), is a value that tells you the ratio of product concentrations to reactant concentrations when a reaction is at equilibrium. It's unique for a given reaction at a specific temperature.
For a general reversible reaction:
$aA + bB \rightleftharpoons cC + dD$
where a, b, c, and d are the stoichiometric coefficients, the equilibrium constant expression is:
$K_{eq} = \frac{[C]^c[D]^d}{[A]^a[B]^b}$
Here's what each part means:
* [ ] denotes the molar concentration (mol/L) of a species at equilibrium.
* The concentrations of products are in the numerator.
* The concentrations of reactants are in the denominator.
* Each concentration is raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient from the balanced chemical equation.
Important points about $K_{eq}$:
* Solids and pure liquids are NOT included in the $K_{eq}$ expression. Their concentrations are considered constant and are absorbed into the $K_{eq}$ value.
* $K_{eq}$ has no units because it's technically derived from activities (effective concentrations), not actual concentrations.
* Temperature dependence: $K_{eq}$ changes with temperature. If the temperature changes, the $K_{eq}$ value changes.
What $K_{eq}$ tells you:
- Large $K_{eq}$ (>1): The equilibrium lies to the right, favoring products. This means at equilibrium, there are significantly more products than reactants.
- Small $K_{eq}$ (<1): The equilibrium lies to the left, favoring reactants. This means at equilibrium, there are significantly more reactants than products.
- $K_{eq}$ ≈ 1: Significant amounts of both reactants and products are present at equilibrium.
Reaction Quotient ($Q$)
The reaction quotient, $Q$, has the same mathematical expression as $K_{eq}$ but uses concentrations at any point in time, not necessarily at equilibrium. You can use $Q$ to predict the direction a reaction will shift to reach equilibrium:
- If $Q < K_{eq}$: There are too many reactants relative to products. The reaction will shift to the right (towards products) to reach equilibrium.
- If $Q > K_{eq}$: There are too many products relative to reactants. The reaction will shift to the left (towards reactants) to reach equilibrium.
- If $Q = K_{eq}$: The system is already at equilibrium.
graph TD
A["Initial Concentrations"] --> B{Calculate Reaction Quotient (Q)};
B --> C{Is Q < K_eq?};
B --> D{Is Q > K_eq?};
B --> E{Is Q = K_eq?};
C --> F["Shift Right (towards products)"];
D --> G["Shift Left (towards reactants)"];
E --> H["At Equilibrium"];
3. Worked Example
Let's consider the synthesis of ammonia:
$N_{2(g)} + 3H_{2(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2NH_{3(g)}$
At a certain temperature, the equilibrium concentrations are found to be:
$[N_2]$ = 0.50 M
$[H_2]$ = 1.50 M
$[NH_3]$ = 0.20 M
Calculate the $K_{eq}$ for this reaction at this temperature.
-
Write the $K_{eq}$ expression:
$K_{eq} = \frac{[NH_3]^2}{[N_2][H_2]^3}$ -
Substitute the equilibrium concentrations:
$K_{eq} = \frac{(0.20)^2}{(0.50)(1.50)^3}$ -
Calculate the values:
Numerator: $(0.20)^2 = 0.040$
Denominator: $(0.50) \times (1.50)^3 = (0.50) \times (3.375) = 1.6875$ -
Perform the division:
$K_{eq} = \frac{0.040}{1.6875} \approx 0.0237$
So, $K_{eq}$ for this reaction at this temperature is approximately 0.024. Since $K_{eq}$ is less than 1, the equilibrium favors the reactants ($N_2$ and $H_2$).
4. Key Takeaways
- Chemical equilibrium is a dynamic state where forward and reverse reaction rates are equal, and net changes in concentration stop.
- The equilibrium constant ($K_{eq}$) quantifies the ratio of products to reactants at equilibrium for a specific reaction at a given temperature.
- $K_{eq} = \frac{[Products]^{coefficients}}{[Reactants]^{coefficients}}$, excluding pure solids and liquids.
- A large $K_{eq}$ indicates products are favored at equilibrium; a small $K_{eq}$ indicates reactants are favored.
- The reaction quotient ($Q$) uses non-equilibrium concentrations to predict which direction a reaction will shift to reach equilibrium.
- If $Q < K_{eq}$, the reaction shifts right; if $Q > K_{eq}$, it shifts left; if $Q = K_{eq}$, it's at equilibrium.
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Forgetting to raise concentrations to their stoichiometric coefficients in the $K_{eq}$ expression.
- Including concentrations of pure solids or pure liquids in the $K_{eq}$ expression.
- Mixing up $K_{eq}$ and $Q$; remember $K_{eq}$ is only for equilibrium concentrations.
- Not balancing the chemical equation before writing the $K_{eq}$ expression.
5. Now Try It
Consider the reaction $2NO_{2(g)} \rightleftharpoons N_2O_{4(g)}$. At 25°C, $K_{eq} = 0.18$. You start with a container where the initial concentrations are $[NO_2]$ = 0.050 M and $[N_2O_4]$ = 0.010 M.
Calculate the reaction quotient ($Q$) for these initial concentrations. Then, based on your calculated $Q$ and the given $K_{eq}$, predict which direction the reaction will shift (towards products or reactants) to reach equilibrium. What success looks like: You'll have a numerical value for $Q$ and a clear statement about the shift direction.
Try it yourself: The Haber process simulator
Frequently asked about Chemical Equilibrium and Equilibrium Constants
More from chemistry
Get the full chemistry curriculum
Clone the complete plan to your dashboard for unlimited AI-generated notes, practice quizzes, and a personalised revision schedule.
Save this course free