Production and Cost in the Very Long Run & Synthesis

TL;DR

In the very long run, all factors of production are variable, allowing firms to choose the most efficient scale of operation. This choice impacts economies of scale (falling average costs) and diseconomies of scale (rising average costs) as output increases. Understanding these concepts helps you analyze how firms grow and become more or less efficient over time.

1. The Mental Model

Think of a small bakery deciding if it should open a second, bigger location across town next year, or even a chain of bakeries in five years. This decision involves changing everything from the oven size to the number of staff, which is what "very long run" means for a firm.

2. The Core Material

In the very long run, unlike the short or long run, a firm can vary all its factors of production – labor, capital, land, and entrepreneurship. This means a firm isn't stuck with a certain factory size or type of machinery; it can completely redesign its production process and scale of operations. The key concept here is returns to scale, which describes how output changes when all inputs are increased proportionally.

Economies of Scale

Photo by BOOM 💥 Photography on Pexels

Economies of scale occur when a firm's average cost of production falls as its output increases. This happens for several reasons:

• Specialization and Division of Labor: Larger firms can allow workers to specialize in specific tasks, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
• Indivisibilities: Some capital equipment or production processes are only efficient at a large scale (e.g., a huge stamping machine for car parts). You can't buy half an efficient machine.
• Bulk-Buying Discounts: Larger firms can negotiate lower prices from suppliers due to purchasing large quantities of raw materials.
• Financial Economies: Larger firms often get lower interest rates on loans and can raise capital more easily.
• Marketing Economies: The cost of advertising a national brand is spread over a much larger sales volume, reducing the per-unit advertising cost.
• Managerial Economies: Larger firms can afford specialized managers for different departments (HR, marketing, finance), leading to more efficient decision-making.

Diseconomies of Scale

Photo by the northern lense on Pexels

Diseconomies of scale occur when a firm's average cost of production rises as its output increases. These usually kick in when a firm becomes too large:

• Managerial Difficulties: As a firm grows, coordinating and controlling operations become more complex. Decision-making can slow down, and communication breakdowns become more common.
• Bureaucracy: Large firms often develop rigid rules and procedures that can stifle innovation and adaptability.
• Worker Alienation: In very large organizations, individual workers might feel less connected to the final product or company goals, leading to reduced motivation and productivity.
• Communication Problems: The more layers of management and employees, the harder it is for information to flow efficiently throughout the organization.

The relationship between output and average cost in the very long run is often represented by the Long Run Average Cost (LRAC) curve. This curve is typically U-shaped: initially falling (due to economies of scale), then reaching a minimum point (the Minimum Efficient Scale - MES), and eventually rising (due to diseconomies of scale).

graph TD
    A["Increase in All Inputs Proportionally"] --> B{"How does Output Change?"}
    B --> C{Increase in Output > Proportionate Increase in Inputs}
    B --> D{Increase in Output = Proportionate Increase in Inputs}
    B --> E{Increase in Output < Proportionate Increase in Inputs}

    C --> C1["Economies of Scale (Average Cost Falls)"]
    D --> D1["Constant Returns to Scale (Average Cost Stays Same)"]
    E --> E1["Diseconomies of Scale (Average Cost Rises)"]

    C1 --> F["Specialisation & Division of Labour"]
    C1 --> G["Indivisibilities of Capital"]
    C1 --> H["Bulk-Buying Discounts"]
    C1 --> I["Financial Economies"]
    C1 --> J["Marketing Economies"]
    C1 --> K["Managerial Economies (Specialised Managers)"]

    E1 --> L["Managerial Difficulties"]
    E1 --> M["Bureaucracy & Slow Decision-Making"]
    E1 --> N["Worker Alienation & Demotivation"]
    E1 --> O["Communication Breakdowns"]

    style C1 fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px;
    style D1 fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px;
    style E1 fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px;

Synthesis with Market Structures

Photo by Gizem toprak on Pexels

The concept of economies and diseconomies of scale is crucial for understanding market structures:

• Natural Monopoly: If economies of scale are very significant and continue over a very large range of output, a single large firm can supply the entire market at a lower average cost than multiple smaller firms. This creates a natural monopoly (e.g., utility companies).
• Oligopoly: If economies of scale are substantial but not endless, a few large firms might dominate an industry because they can achieve lower costs than smaller competitors.
• Perfect Competition / Monopolistic Competition: If economies of scale are limited or quickly exhausted, many smaller firms can efficiently operate in the market, as there's no major cost advantage to being very large.

Technological Progress

Photo by AlphaTradeZone on Pexels

The very long run also considers technological progress. New technologies can shift the entire LRAC curve downwards, meaning a firm can produce any given output level at a lower average cost than before. This is different from moving along an existing LRAC curve; it's a fundamental improvement in production capabilities.

3. Worked Example

Imagine a company, "RoboWidgets Inc.," which produces robotic components.

Initially, RoboWidgets operates with a small factory, 10 workers, and basic machinery. They produce 1,000 components per month at an average cost of $50 per component.

As demand increases, they decide to scale up. They build a larger, more automated factory, hire 50 specialized workers (engineers, assembly line workers, quality control experts), and invest in advanced robotic assembly lines. Their output jumps to 10,000 components per month, and due to bulk discounts on raw materials, more efficient use of machinery (indivisibilities), and specialized management, their average cost drops to $30 per component. This shows economies of scale.

Encouraged, they expand further, building 10 identical large factories, hiring 500 workers, and establishing a complex management structure across various regions. Their output is now 100,000 components per month. However, they start facing issues: communication between factories is slow, quality control suffers due to lack of oversight, regional managers start making conflicting decisions, and workers feel disconnected. Their average cost per component now rises to